https://greenmarked.it/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Copia-di-Parabolic-recorder-scaled.jpg
1920
2560
Jennifer Lüdtke
https://greenmarked.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LOGO-GREENMARKED-SITO-600x600.png
Jennifer Lüdtke2026-03-08 14:56:142026-04-07 23:17:05Behind the Lens and Beyond the Microphone: Studying Wildlife with AIAs explored in a previous article by GreenMarked, peat extraction in South Tyrol has long been a topic of controversy. The debate is complex, involving agriculture, environmental protection, the peat industry, and the interests of the local community. But what if the design could serve as a mediating discipline — shifting the conversation from a history of conflict towards a more hopeful post-extraction future? The role of designers today is changing as designers become mediators between research, politics, and society [1]. An exhibition in Salurn offers an inspiring insight into this possibility, its potential and its limits.
From January 28 to February 7, the exhibition Val di Torba was presented at the public library in Salurn, South Tyrol. Developed as part of my master’s thesis in Eco-Social Design, it became the result of a long research process. The exhibition aimed to compile and share knowledge about peatlands, the role of peat in the Adige Valley, and its climate impact, while also creating a space for open dialogue on these topics. Salurn, with its long history of peat extraction and related conflicts, was an important location to showcase the project. The public library, as a place of knowledge and exchange, offered the perfect setting.

Figure 1: Exhibition poster. Author, 2025.
The exhibition followed a participatory format, where the goal was to empower participants and share decision-making power throughout the design process [2]. Therefore, it invited visitors to contribute their knowledge, ideas, hopes, and concerns throughout ten days. Afternoon workshop sessions helped to collect these contributions, capturing them as written comments in a guest book and on a big sheet of paper.
In this way, the exhibition attracted great interest from the local community and achieved surprising results. Around 90 people visited the exhibition, including farmers, environmentalists, residents, activists, local politicians, environmental organizations, and representatives of the peat industry. Even three school classes visited, learning about the valley’s history and its current challenges. With peat extraction expected to be banned soon [3], discussions focused on the future of the valley. Through illustrations and narrative texts, future scenarios offered inspiration for potential pathways.

Figure 2: Exhibition opening. Author, 2025.
In addition to discussing these scenarios, participants also created new ones. One very popular suggestion was to transform a former peat extraction site into a lake. Could this “nature pool” stop the release of CO2 emissions from the surrounding peat, while creating a place for people to swim and for nature to develop? Other new ideas focused on creating more compensation areas or expanding biotopes. It was also suggested that ongoing peat extraction licenses could be returned if the community decided against them and would financially compensate. With all the different stakeholders involved in this debate, discussions were sometimes tense, but they also led to surprising outcomes. For instance, some farmers expressed interest in exploring alternative cultivation methods for peat soils, where apple cultivation is currently challenging. Discussions emerged about cultivating reeds, cattails, bamboo, or rice. One captivating statement in the debate was: “We should not adjust the land to the use, but rather adjust the use to the land”.

Figure 3: Comments in The Future Scenario Book. Author, 2025.
The closing event offered an opportunity to reflect on the exhibition’s outcomes and discuss potential next steps. The ten days of discussions generated many hopeful perspectives but also revealed that much remains to be done. An exhibition alone cannot solve the complex issue of peat extraction, but it can serve as a starting point for ongoing dialogue. The insights gathered during the exhibition, including written comments and new scenarios, were compiled into a final report as the official outcome of the process. It is being shared with the library, participants of the exhibition and other interested stakeholders. Some institutions have already expressed interest in continuing the dialogue around this topic — with the report as a valuable foundation.
All of this wouldn’t have been possible without the exhibition as a space for dialogue. This demonstrates how design, as a creative and mediating discipline, can play an important role in addressing environmental issues — not just for peat extraction, but for other topics as well.
References:
[1] Groß, B. and Mandir, E. (2022): Zukünfte gestalten – Spekulation, Kritik, Innovation: mit Design Futuring Zukunftsszenarien strategisch erkunden, entwerfen und verhandeln. Mainz: Verlag Hermann Schmidt.
[2] Ehn, P. (2008) ‘Participation in Design Things’, in Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Participatory Design. PDC 2008, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
[3] Regional Law, 16 August, 2023, Nr. 19 https://lexbrowser.provinz.bz.it/doc/de/231085/landesgesetz_vom_16_august_2023_nr_19.aspx? view=1
Cover image: Exhibition opening. Photo by Author, 2025

This article is part of the project “Quiz Ambientali per un Trentino Più Verde!” carried out by Econtrovertia APS and sponsored by Fondazione Cassa Rurale di Trento (Notice of Approval of December 20, 2024).


















